John Whitehead's Commentary

"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, from those who are cold and are not clothed. The world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children."--Dwight D. Eisenhower

The warnings in Eisenhower's 1961 Farewell Address to the Nation concerning the rise of the military-industrial complex are even more relevant today. "The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex," he proclaimed.

And as the colossal war machine continues to grow and its tentacles reach into every sphere of American society, it is, in vampiric fashion, draining the lifeblood of the country. A few recent statistics tell the story.

In four years, the Bush Administration has allocated over $400 billion to overall military spending, much of this to support the arms industry. For the 2006 fiscal year, the military budget is set at $439.3 billion. However, this does not include 2006 funding for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars ($49.1 billion) and Homeland Security ($41.1 billion). More than $230 billion has already been spent on the war in Iraq, and it is estimated that before the end of 2006, the cost of U.S. military operations will top the $500 billion mark. This is ten times the amount estimated by the Administration prior to the invasion of Iraq.

With so much allocated to fighting the war in Iraq, the Bush Administration and Congress have cut funding elsewhere. For the most part, this has meant cutting funds for the poor and elderly. In December 2005, Congress passed a budget bill (with Dick Cheney as the deciding vote) to cut $40 billion in federal spending by ending funding for foster care, child support and student loans. It also imposed new fees on Medicaid recipients and new work restrictions on state welfare programs. Moreover, in the days following Bush's 2006 State of the Union Address, his Administration began the process of implementing a series of budget measures that will cut even more funding for health care and education in order to allocate greater sums of money for the war machine. Recently, Bush proposed a staggering $2.77 trillion budget for war spending in 2007. The White House also said it planned to ask Congress for an additional $70 billion over what has already been proposed for war spending in Iraq and Afghanistan, driving the cost of military operations in these countries to $120 billion this year.

In contrast to the allocation of funds for the military, Bush has proposed cuts to 141 domestic programs over the next five years--again, mostly affecting the poor and elderly. The Republican-dominated House of Representatives has now approved a $39.5 billion five year budget cutting package, with more than half coming from Medicare and Medicaid funding. The proposed cut to Medicare alone over the next five years is $36 billion, with much of this consisting of reductions in payments to hospitals and other health facilities.

The Bush plan would terminate the Commodity Supplemental Food Program, commonly known as "Meals on Wheels," which provides food assistance to more than 400,000 low income seniors, needy pregnant women and children. Instead, these seniors would be switched over to food stamps--something elderly people are generally reluctant to sign up for.

Along with this, Bush has proposed that welfare recipients who receive child care, education, training and other services--but no cash welfare assistance--no longer be automatically eligible for food stamps. Therefore, over the next ten years, $1 billion in federal funding would be cut from food stamp programs, and anywhere from 200,000 to 300,000 fewer people would receive food assistance.

Over the next five years, $1 billion in childcare funds would be eliminated, which would cut 300,000 lower income children from childcare assistance by 2009. And the 2007 budget proposes cuts of $600 million from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, a 1.8% decrease to funds given in the 2006 budget to a program that assists 5.18 million very low income families with critical housing problems.

Currently, the 2007 budget includes the largest cuts ever to educational services for American students. The Bush Administration has again cut funding for the Head Start Program, without giving heed to inflation. Due to this, 19,000 children could be cut from the program or the program could be forced to cut teachers, educational activities and parent educational services, which typically are vital to children succeeding in kindergarten. Predictions in Bush's analysis of the budget include cutting childcare assistance for 400,000 needy children by 2011.

Also in the area of education, this year's budget continues to delay fulfilling the President's promises (and the law) to fully fund the No Child Left Behind Act, cutting $15.4 billion in federal funding and raising the amount it has been shortchanging schools and schoolchildren from $40 billion to around $55 billion. For higher education, Bush has frozen the maximum Pell Grant award at $4,050, eliminated the Perkins Loan program altogether and has proposed getting rid of the Leveraging Educational Assistance Partnership (LEAP), which provides a match of federal funding to states for need-based grant and work-study assistance. These measures give low income students less of a chance to attend college and graduate schools. All of this comes at a time when the cost of a college education for most Americans is becoming non-affordable.

And, of course, the staggering national debt is being affected. Pie charts of total federal funds at the end of 2005 indicate that 30% of the government budget is spent on current military spending, with an additional 18% spent on past military (veterans' benefits plus 80% of the interest on the debt). Analysts differ on how much of the national debt stems from the military, with estimates ranging from 50% to 80%. Some analysts believe national bankruptcy is possible.

In commenting on the conjunction of the immense military establishment and the large arms industry, Eisenhower proclaimed in his farewell address: "The total influence--economic, political, even spiritual--is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society."

And, "we must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow."

Finally: "We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together."

ABOUT JOHN W. WHITEHEAD

Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. His most recent books are the best-selling Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the award-winning A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, and a debut dystopian fiction novel, The Erik Blair Diaries. Whitehead can be contacted at staff@rutherford.org. Nisha Whitehead is the Executive Director of The Rutherford Institute. Information about The Rutherford Institute is available at www.rutherford.org.

Publication Guidelines / Reprint Permission

John W. Whitehead’s weekly commentaries are available for publication to newspapers and web publications at no charge. Please contact staff@rutherford.org to obtain reprint permission.