John Whitehead's Commentary
Tasers: Stop the Use of this Dangerous Weapon
Currently, tasers are used by more than 5,000 law enforcement agencies in the United States. Electro-shock weapons designed to cause instant incapacitation by delivering a 50,000 volt shock, tasers are hand-held electronic stun guns that fire two barbed darts. The darts, which usually remain attached to the gun by wires, deliver the high voltage shock and can penetrate up to two inches of clothing or skin. The darts can strike the subject from a distance of up to twenty feet, or the taser can be applied directly to the skin. Although a taser shot is capable of jamming the central nervous system for up to 30 seconds, it can disable the subject for even longer. And because tasers can be aimed anywhere on the body, they can immobilize someone more easily than pepper spray, which must be sprayed in the face.
Taser manufacturers and law enforcement agencies argue that tasers are a safer alternative to many conventional weapons typically used to restrain dangerous individuals. This may be true in situations where tasers are used as an alternative to other impact weapons that can cause serious injury, such as batons, or even lethal force. However, research shows that in many police departments, officers routinely use tasers primarily as a substitute for low-level force weapons such as pepper spray or chemical spray. They have become a prevalent force tool, most often used against individuals who do not pose a serious danger to themselves, the officers or others.
A recent study compiled by Amnesty International reports that in instances where tasers are used, 80 percent of the time they are used on unarmed suspects. In 36 percent of the cases, they are used for verbal non-compliance, but only three percent of the time are they used for cases involving "deadly assault."
Tasers have been used on children and unarmed individuals who fail to immediately comply with officers' commands. Since 2001, more than seventy people are reported to have died in the United States and Canada after being struck by a taser. Most of them were unarmed men who, "while displaying disturbed or combative behavior, did not present a serious threat to the lives or safety of others." They were subjected to extreme levels of force including repeated taser discharges even when handcuffed or "hogtied" on the ground.
In Florida, a fourteen-year-old schoolgirl was tasered after arguing with police officers after she and other children were put off a bus during a disturbance. She was stunned directly to the chest and then stunned twice from a distance before she was handcuffed. In Oregon, a newspaper reported that officers use tasers on non-compliant people "after stopping them for nonviolent offenses, such as littering and jaywalking." In Arizona, a thirteen-year-old girl was tasered in a public library after she threw a book. In Missouri, an unarmed 66-year-old woman was tasered twice as she resisted being issued a ticket for honking her car horn at a police car. In the same state, an officer used a taser on a nine-year-old girl who had run away from a residential home for severely emotionally disturbed children. The child was already handcuffed and sitting in the back of a police car. The taser was used as the officer was struggling to put leg-restraints on her.
Amnesty International has expressed its concern that despite the wide use of tasers, there has been no independent and impartial study of their use and effects. The group questions the veracity of claims that existing studies provide evidence proving that tasers are safe. Among the problems with such studies is that they raise concern about the effects of a 50,000-volt shock on people with preexisting heart conditions. No independent studies on the most recently manufactured tasers, which are much more powerful than earlier ones, have been conducted to date. The growing use of these weapons, as well as the number of deaths of individuals struck by them, raises serious questions.
Furthermore, the use of tasers in law enforcement raises a number of concerns for the protection of human rights. Portable and easy to use, with the capacity to inflict severe pain at the push of a button without leaving substantial marks, tasers are open to abuse by officers. Their use often violates standards set out under the UN Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials, which requires that force be used as a last resort and that only the minimum amount necessary be used.
Taser International, the company that manufactures and sells the stun guns, has sold them primarily to law enforcement agencies. The company has sold at least 135,000 to such agencies nationwide. However, since 1994, slightly less powerful tasers have been available for sale to the general public, although several states and cities restrict or ban the weapon. A February 2005 ABC news report states that, just recently, Taser International, in following the money trail, has begun targeting the civilian population to increase their sales. The consumer model costs around $1,000 and delivers a 50,000-volt shock. Although Taser International supports legislation requiring background checks for taser purchases, there are currently few restrictions on taser sales.
Far more alarming even than the inappropriate use of tasers by police officers is the fact that these weapons are available to the public in the United States. A silent and instantly crippling weapon, the taser is ideal for criminals to assist them in robbery, rape, abduction, etc. An attacker would be able to carry his own personal victim-paralyzing device, powerful enough to instantly incapacitate the victim and give the attacker complete control.
Clearly, government officials should immediately suspend all use of tasers, at least until a comprehensive medical study can be conducted proving they are safe to the general public when used by police officers. Even if such a study is completed, tasers should not be made available for purchase in the United States by the general public. Indeed, we must ensure that not only are we safe from police abuse but that we are also safe from our fellow citizens as well.
Taser manufacturers and law enforcement agencies argue that tasers are a safer alternative to many conventional weapons typically used to restrain dangerous individuals. This may be true in situations where tasers are used as an alternative to other impact weapons that can cause serious injury, such as batons, or even lethal force. However, research shows that in many police departments, officers routinely use tasers primarily as a substitute for low-level force weapons such as pepper spray or chemical spray. They have become a prevalent force tool, most often used against individuals who do not pose a serious danger to themselves, the officers or others.
A recent study compiled by Amnesty International reports that in instances where tasers are used, 80 percent of the time they are used on unarmed suspects. In 36 percent of the cases, they are used for verbal non-compliance, but only three percent of the time are they used for cases involving "deadly assault."
Tasers have been used on children and unarmed individuals who fail to immediately comply with officers' commands. Since 2001, more than seventy people are reported to have died in the United States and Canada after being struck by a taser. Most of them were unarmed men who, "while displaying disturbed or combative behavior, did not present a serious threat to the lives or safety of others." They were subjected to extreme levels of force including repeated taser discharges even when handcuffed or "hogtied" on the ground.
In Florida, a fourteen-year-old schoolgirl was tasered after arguing with police officers after she and other children were put off a bus during a disturbance. She was stunned directly to the chest and then stunned twice from a distance before she was handcuffed. In Oregon, a newspaper reported that officers use tasers on non-compliant people "after stopping them for nonviolent offenses, such as littering and jaywalking." In Arizona, a thirteen-year-old girl was tasered in a public library after she threw a book. In Missouri, an unarmed 66-year-old woman was tasered twice as she resisted being issued a ticket for honking her car horn at a police car. In the same state, an officer used a taser on a nine-year-old girl who had run away from a residential home for severely emotionally disturbed children. The child was already handcuffed and sitting in the back of a police car. The taser was used as the officer was struggling to put leg-restraints on her.
Amnesty International has expressed its concern that despite the wide use of tasers, there has been no independent and impartial study of their use and effects. The group questions the veracity of claims that existing studies provide evidence proving that tasers are safe. Among the problems with such studies is that they raise concern about the effects of a 50,000-volt shock on people with preexisting heart conditions. No independent studies on the most recently manufactured tasers, which are much more powerful than earlier ones, have been conducted to date. The growing use of these weapons, as well as the number of deaths of individuals struck by them, raises serious questions.
Furthermore, the use of tasers in law enforcement raises a number of concerns for the protection of human rights. Portable and easy to use, with the capacity to inflict severe pain at the push of a button without leaving substantial marks, tasers are open to abuse by officers. Their use often violates standards set out under the UN Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials, which requires that force be used as a last resort and that only the minimum amount necessary be used.
Taser International, the company that manufactures and sells the stun guns, has sold them primarily to law enforcement agencies. The company has sold at least 135,000 to such agencies nationwide. However, since 1994, slightly less powerful tasers have been available for sale to the general public, although several states and cities restrict or ban the weapon. A February 2005 ABC news report states that, just recently, Taser International, in following the money trail, has begun targeting the civilian population to increase their sales. The consumer model costs around $1,000 and delivers a 50,000-volt shock. Although Taser International supports legislation requiring background checks for taser purchases, there are currently few restrictions on taser sales.
Far more alarming even than the inappropriate use of tasers by police officers is the fact that these weapons are available to the public in the United States. A silent and instantly crippling weapon, the taser is ideal for criminals to assist them in robbery, rape, abduction, etc. An attacker would be able to carry his own personal victim-paralyzing device, powerful enough to instantly incapacitate the victim and give the attacker complete control.
Clearly, government officials should immediately suspend all use of tasers, at least until a comprehensive medical study can be conducted proving they are safe to the general public when used by police officers. Even if such a study is completed, tasers should not be made available for purchase in the United States by the general public. Indeed, we must ensure that not only are we safe from police abuse but that we are also safe from our fellow citizens as well.
ABOUT JOHN W. WHITEHEAD
Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. His most recent books are the best-selling Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the award-winning A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, and a debut dystopian fiction novel, The Erik Blair Diaries. Whitehead can be contacted at staff@rutherford.org. Nisha Whitehead is the Executive Director of The Rutherford Institute. Information about The Rutherford Institute is available at www.rutherford.org.
Publication Guidelines / Reprint Permission
John W. Whitehead’s weekly commentaries are available for publication to newspapers and web publications at no charge. Please contact staff@rutherford.org to obtain reprint permission.
